Cox's Administrator v. Jones
Cox's Administrator v. Jones
2 D.C. 370; 6 F. Cas. 680; 2 Cranch 370
Opinion of the Court
(nem. con.) rejected the evidence, and said the in-dorsement became a new bill. The holder was bound to present the note again to Badeliffe for payment; and, if not paid, to give notice to the defendant, of the non-payment. It would be a fraud in the defendant to indorse the note generally, so as to give a new negotiability to the instrument, and then to set up his secret equity against an innocent holder.
Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.