Botelor v. Corporation of Washington
Botelor v. Corporation of Washington
2 D.C. 676; 3 F. Cas. 962; 2 Cranch 676
Opinion of the Court
decided that rye-éhop (which was food for horses,) was not “ provision ” nor an “ article of food ” within the meaning of the by-law. (Burch’s Digest, p. 119, art. 9.) And that “ coming to market” meant, on its way to the market-place, with intent to be there offered for sale, in
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.