Bank of the U. S. v. Corcoran
Bank of the U. S. v. Corcoran
3 D.C. 46
Opinion of the Court
The Court (Thruston, J. contra,) instructed the jury that such notice, so left, was not sufficient to charge the defendant.
But the Court (Thruston, J. contra,) refused to give the instruction, because they thought the papers did not warrant such an inference.
Bills of exception were taken, and upon the- writ of error, the judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States upon both points. 2 Peters, 121.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.