U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1826

McGunnigle v. Blake

McGunnigle v. Blake
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Decided December 15, 1826
3 D.C. 64; 16 F. Cas. 145; 3 Cranch 64
McGunnigle v. Blake

Opinion of the Court

The Court said that in an action for mere use and occupation, not founded on an express contract for an entire rent, eviction of part is not a bar to the whole action; because the plaintiff is entitled to recover damages for the actual use and occupation ; and if the defendant was deprived of the use for a certain part of the time, and afterwards resumed the occupation and use of the premises, the jury will consider that circumstance in estimating the damages.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.