Bank of the United States v. Lee
Bank of the United States v. Lee
3 D.C. 288
Opinion of the Court
The Court, (nem. con.) on the motion of Mr. Taylor, the defendant’s counsel, instructed the jury, in effect, that if they should find from the evidence that the plaintiffs, in consideration of new security given by the maker of the note, agreed with him, without the defendant’s consent, to extend the time of payment of the debt for one year or more, the defendant was thereby discharged from his liability as indorser of the note.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.