Bank of Alexandria v. McCrea

however, (nem. con.) overruled the objection; because it was not attempted to be shown that the money was paid to him; and because, if it was paid to him, and he had not credited it, he would •be liable to the defendant, or to the bank.

THE COURT also said, that they had decided at "Washington, in Bank of United States v. Wilson, [Case No. 943,] that the payment of a cheek by the bank was prima facie evidence of funds in bank to the amount •of the check.