McClean v. Plumsell

But the Court refused, and directed that the entry of the judgment of the Court be, “that the said Thomas Plumsell be precluded from any benefit under the act,” &c., according to the precedent in Walter Newton’s case, at April term, 1824. [2 Cranch, C. C. 467.]

See the case of Keirll v. McIntire, at May term, 1826, [2 Cranch, C. C. 670,] and Fitzgerald's case, at this term, [post, 90.]