U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1838

Broeck v. Pendleton

Broeck v. Pendleton
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Decided March 15, 1838 · Cranch
5 D.C. 464; 23 F. Cas. 839; 5 Cranch 464
Broeck v. Pendleton

Opinion of the Court

The CouRT

(Cranch, C. J.,

contra:,) was of opinion, that the attachment should be quashed.

Mr. Bradley then moved to amend the short note, by stating the instrument to be under seal, and to declare in debt. There is no bail to be injured by the amendment. The property of the debtor, himself, is attached. The motion to quash is made really by the defendant, through the garnishee.

The Court refused leave to amend by changing the action from case to debt, because the short note of the cause of action would not have given the defendant the notice which the act contemplates.

The attachment was quashed, because it was to compel the defendant to answer in an action of trespass on the case, when the cause of action was in debt upon a sealed instrument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.