U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1838

Wilson v. City Bank

Wilson v. City Bank
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Decided October 15, 1838 · Story
30 F. Cas. 116; 3 Sumn. 422

Counsel

F. C. Loring and P. Blair, for defendants, in support of the demurrer., C. P. and B. R. Curtis, for plaintiffs, spoke against the demurrer.

Wilson v. City Bank

Opinion of the Court

STORY, Circuit Justice,

held, that the demurrer was good, as to the first, second, and fourth causes of demurrer; but not for the third.

1. The bill ought to have alleged, that the plaintiff was a subject or citizen of some one foreign state.

2. The allegation ought to have been, that the corporators were all citizens of some one Or more state or states of the United States.

3. The circuit court has jurisdiction to aid in enforcing the judgment of a state court.

4. That Williams was a necessary party to the bill.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.