Gibson v. Betts

decided, that after the adjudications on Woodworth’s patent, he would not, on a motion for an injunction, entertain any question as to the originality of Woodworth’s invention, or as to the validity of the re-issued patent. He also decided that the defendant’s machine was an infringement of Woodworth’s. Injunction granted.

[For other cases involving this patent, see note to Bicknell v. Todd, Case No. 1,3S9.]