Washington v. Dawson
Washington v. Dawson
29 F. Cas. 345; 1 Hayw. & H.D.C. 236; 1846 U.S. App. LEXIS 590
Opinion of the Court
and DUNLOP concurred in the opinion expressed at the bar; that the practice should be established, and witnesses should know that it was their duty to yield obedience to the summons of the constituted authorities.
Concurring Opinion
concurred in these remarks, fined the witness one dollar, and required him to pay the costs of the attachment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.