Low v. Hauel
Low v. Hauel
15 F. Cas. 1010; 1 Wall. Jr. 345; 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 419
Opinion of the Court
It is not usual, in this circuit, to insert a pecuniary penalty, though one is almost always found in the English forms. There was a ease here, some time since, where, a penalty being inserted, the matter was said to be misunderstood. The defendant, professing to understand it as an alternative, proceeded to violate the injunction, finding it more profitable. perhaps, to pay the penalty, than to desist from his work. Money penalty not inserted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.