Carrigan v. The Charles Pitman
Carrigan v. The Charles Pitman
5 F. Cas. 149; 1 Wall. Jr. 307; 1849 U.S. App. LEXIS 368
Opinion of the Court
The practice at this bar having been for many years to proceed de novo in the testimony. I hardly feel at liberty now to change it; though I have rather grumbled in one or two cases; where parties finding out from the opinion of the district judge where their case pinched, have taken new testimony here to help them out of their difficulty; and have thus presented so different a ease to me, that I have reversed my Brother Kane’s decisions, when they were perfectly right, upon the facts presented to him. But under such circumstances I have allowed no costs to the party succeeding, and generally speaking, should think this rule to be but equitable. Rule allowed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.