Charge to Grand Jury—Neutrality Laws
Opinion of the Court
(charging grand jury). The general terms providing or preparing means were clearly intended by congress to refer to the usual .means for a military expedition. Such ex-iedition cannot be carried
We know, gentlemen of the grand jury, that peaceful relations exist between this country and Nicaragua, and that neither government has given any indications of a disposition to have those relations interrupted. What, then, the government of the United States is unwilling to do, it ill becomes small detachments of its citizens, acting independently and upon their own responsibility, to accomplish. Such a course must inevitably produce what the eminent jurist to whom we have already alluded has denominated that “monstrous anomaly in the history of the world, of a nation at peace, while its citizens are at war.” And, surely, it is unnecessary for me to depict the calamities attendant upon war, even when waged in its mildest forms. An invasion by an army of an adequate force carries desolation in its path. The unoffending inhabitants of the invaded country endure, without the power of resistance, every species of outrage and suffering. The quartering of troops in their ■ dwellings without their consent; the subsistence of those troops upon provisions which they have accumulated by honest toil; the pillage and plunder to which their farms and plantations are subjected without the hope of compensation for the losses they may sustain,—are but a few of the evils and calamities to which they must submit. And let it ever be remembered that innocent women and children are at all times the sharers in the sufferings which these military invasions never fail to produce in their desolatory progress. If, on the other hand, an invasion is attempted by an inadequate force, the suSerings and dangers of the invaders themselves must be in proportion to their inability to encounter them. Whether or not it be the duty of the government to interfere to avert the dangers to which a portion of its citizens may choose thus to expose themselves is a question which we need not decide. But surely it may be urged as an argument, to show the humanity of the law, that its faithful and rigid enforcement, whether by the government or the courts, may be instrumental in saving deluded persons from the perils into which they would blindly rush under the guidance of their leaders, and under the influence of promises which may never be fulfilled, and of hopes which may never be realized.
With these remarks, gentlemen, I now commit the whole subject to your consideration, confident that you will discharge with fidelity the important duty which now devolves upon you.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.