United States v. Wrape
Opinion of the Court
(charging jury). Section 5440 of the Revised Statutes of the United States declares that if two or more persons conspire to commit any offense against the United States, and one or more of such parties do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, all the parties to such conspiracy shall be liable, etc. The offenses which the indictment charges the defendants with having conspired to commit are found in section 5512 of the Revised Statutes. By this it is made an offense if at any election for representative or delegate in congress, any person knowingly does any unlawful act to secure an opportunity to ■ himself or others to vote, or knowingly aids, counsels, procures or advises any person to vote at a place where he may not be lawfully entitled to vote. Two things are necessary to constitute the crime charged, namely, the agreement or conspiracy to commit an offense, and an act to effect the illegal object. That act need not be illegal in itself. Any act which is intended to effect the object of the conspiracy, and which tends in that direction, is sufficient. An agreement between two or more persons to commit any offense against the United States is a conspiracy, within the meaning of section 0440. Conspiracies are usually entered into in secret, and need not be established by direct evidence, their existence being often inferred from circumstances. They may be formed and exist without any express agreement, written or oral, and may accomplish their object without any formal meeting of the conspirators ever taking place. It is not necessary that the parties should all be acquainted with each other, or that each should know the exact part the others are to perform. It is sufficient if all have a common illegal purpose or design, and act in pursuance of it. Persons may join a conspiracy at any time, and become responsible for everything said and done by any of the members in furtherance- of the common purpose.
If the defendants were united in a joint effort to induce or persuade men to go into Jennings county and vote at said election, understanding and believing, without fault or negligence on their part, that such persons were bona fide residents of that county, and had a legal right to vote therein, they are not guilty, although mistaken as to the fact of such residence. The defendants had a right to persuade men who had acquired a legal residence in the state to remove from other counties into Jennings county, and there acquire an actual residence, even if the motive for so doing was to have the benefit of such persons’ votes in Jennings county at said election. If, therefore, the defendants on trial, or any two of them, or any one of those on trial, and one or more of those not on trial, conspired together as charged in the indictment, to import or cause to be imported, per
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.