Falk v. Robertson
Opinion of the Court
This suit is brought to recover back money paid for duties on leaf tobacco under Schedule F of the act of 1883, which lays a duty on “leaf tobacco of which eighty-five per cent, is of the requisite size, and of the necessary fineness of texture, to he suitable
Upon further consideration of the subject on a motion for a new trial it now seems that sufficient attention was not given to the composition of the bales. The quality and standard of the superior grade were not changed by binding the inferior grade, in a separable manner, with it into a bale. A distinct quantity of the superior quality, subject to the higher rate, was imported with each of the bales. It was the same where it came from, and all the way, and after its arrival. The act of congress does not refer to any particular quantity as a basis for the'85 per cent. It appears to be intended to apply to any distinct quantity of the requisite qualities which should be imported. This is different from the case supposed in argument, of cloth made within one of the number of threads to the inch at which the rate of duty would be changed. There an article was made on which a certain rate of duty would be imposed, and the article would always remain the same. Here the article was sought to be reduced by association with another article during importation, and to be restored afterwards. But the association did not reduce nor affect it.
Justice to the plaintiffs, however, requires that they be entirely acquitted of any attempt to deceive the customs officers by what they did; for it was done with their full knowledge, and partly at their suggestion, and 'after á like importation, with the full knowledge of all) had been passed, as a test case, at the lower rate.- Still the department is. not estopped, nor claimed to be, from changing its decision, although it may work a hardship. Yerdict set aside, and new trial, granted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.