Holt v. Winters
Holt v. Winters
30 F. 29
Opinion of the Court
The defendant moves for an order on the plaintiff to furnish security for costs, because he is not a resident of the state of New York. He is set up in the proceedings as such resident. On all the papers it does not appear but that he is so set up properly and correctly. The motion is therefore denied. This is not intended to imply that the motion would be granted if he was shown to be a non-resident.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.