Torrent v. Duluth Lumber Co.
Torrent v. Duluth Lumber Co.
32 F. 229; 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2744
Torrent v. Duluth Lumber Co.
Opinion of the Court
This is a petition for a rehearing and reargument of the case. In the opinion of the court heretofore delivered in this case (30 Fed. Rep. 830) the court (page 835) misquotes the testimony, viz.: “It has to have it on,” quoted from Robert Orm’s testimony, should read: “They all have to have something to hold the tooth-bar up to the log;” hut such misquotation does not change the opinion of the court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.