U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, 1889

Smith v. Davidson

Smith v. Davidson
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · Decided December 15, 1889 · Nelson
41 F. 172

Smith v. Davidson

Opinion of the Court

Nelson, J.

I think the court erred in permitting the original answer, sworn to by one of the attorneys for the defendant, to be offered in evidence as an admission by the defendant of the .facts therein stated. An amended answer having been filed to take the place of the original, it should have been excluded from the jury. The ruling of the court having been properly excepted to, the defendant is entitled to a new trial for such error. New trial granted. Costs to abide the event of the suit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.