Minnesota v. Gooch
Minnesota v. Gooch
Opinion of the Court
The petition of Charles E. -Gooch is presented, praying for a writ of habeas corpus to discharge him from aii imprisonment alleged to be in violation of the constitution of the United States. The writ.'is
'The questions presented in this case were fully considered and decided by the United Slates supreme court in Leisy v. Hardin, 135 U. S. 100, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 681, and that court decided, in brief, that commerce among the several states was subject only to the regulations imposed by congress, and that tlie states could not interfere with or regulate such commerce; and, further, that the right to transport an article of commerce from one state to another included the right to sell in the unbroken imported packages at the place where the transit terminated. The petitioner then, under the uncontradicted facts, is guilty of no offense in selling the oleomargarine in the original package, and his arrest and imprisonment for doing so is illegal, and in violation of the constitution of the United States. The prisoner is entitled to his discharge, and it is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.