Carson & Rand Lumber Co. v. Holtzclaw

(after stating facts as above.') In any view that maybe taken of the facts as above stated, the motion to remand must be sustained. Having failed in the effort to remove the cause on the ground of prejudice and local influence, it seems that an attempt was made to *786remove on other grounds, by amending the original petition for removal some months after it had been filed.. The application was made too late, and the motion to remand must be sustained. It is so ordered. .