U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1892

In re Crowly

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Decided February 25, 1892 · Lacombe

50 F. 465; 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1744

Counsel

Edward Mitchell, U. S. Atty., and James T. Van Rensselaer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Curie, Smith & Maride, for importer.

Opinion of the Court

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the board of appraisers is affirmed, and the court declines to go into the question as to whether they correctly determined that the silk embroidery made the article upon which it was placed dutiable as if it had been embroidered in wool, for the reason that there has been no statement of any error of law or fact complained of, touching such decision, filed in this court, or any application for review thereof in that particular.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.