Rudolph v. Williams
Opinion of the Court
It is argued by the defendants that a court of equity should not, under the provisions of section 4915, award a patent to a party who has litigated the question of priority of invention through all stages of the patent office, and been defeated. simply because the court, if the question had been originally presented to it, would have reached a different conclusion, it is insisted that something more than the ordinary quantum of evidence is required of a complainant who seeks to secure a decree, upon a simple question of fact, at variance with the deliberately expressed judgment of the patent office officials, and, it is suggested, that the action must proceed upon the same lines as though it were a bill filed to set aside a judgment at law. There is certainly force in these propositions,
The evidence here is substantially what it was in the interference proceedings, and as the salient points have been clearly stated in the three opinions there rendered it is unnecessary to recapitu
The bill, is dismissed.
Note. See Morgan v. Daniels, 153 U. S. 120, 14 Sup. Ct. 772.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.