U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania, 1894

Messinger v. New England Mut. Life Ins.

Messinger v. New England Mut. Life Ins.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · Decided January 15, 1894 · Bhffihgrtoh
59 F. 416; 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2700
Messinger v. New England Mut. Life Ins.

Opinion of the Court

BHFFIHGrTOH, District Judge.

A bill in equity is here filed by I. H. Messinger, administrator d. b. n. of Joseph O. Raudenbusli, against the New England Mutual Life Insurance Company, to cancel and rescind a release executed by a former administrator of all claims under a policy issued by the respondent company upon the life of said decedent. To this bill a plea is filed, setting forth that a final decree had been entered in favor of the respondent (which was unappealed from) in a suit in this court, at Ho. 34, Hovember term, 1892, between the same parties, and involving the same subject-matter. In the former case the respondent demurred to the bill because it did not disclose facts sufficient to constitute a cause *417of action, which demurrer was sustained by the court; and subsequently, no application to amend being made, a final decree was entered, dismissing the bill. Such a decree is a final judgment of the rights of the parties, and is a bar to a subsequent suit between the same parties on the same subject-matter. Alley v. Nott, 111 U. S. 473, 4 Sup. Ct. 495; Bissell v. Spring Valley Tp., 124 U. S. 232, 8 Sup. Ct. 495.

The parties to the present suit, and the subject-matter, being the same as those in the former suit, we are of opinion the plea is well founded, in point of law, and presents a complete defense to the bill, and the latter should be dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.