Blumenthal v. United States
Opinion of the Court
(orally). The importations are harmonicas, consisting of two parts, one made of wood and metal which may be called the harmonica proper, and the other a celluloid case to cover the same. These articles were imported by one importer and upon the same vessel. They were, however, in different boxes and covered by different invoices. The,evidence is that the cases have no use except for harmónica! covers,-and that any harmonica of the size im
I understand that it is undisputed that in a former decision of this court harmonicas similar to these were held to be toys. The district attorney insists that the importer is not in a position to raise this question for the reason that he has in his protest called them “musical instruments.” The protest is in the alternative form, one clause clearly raising the question which is in dispute here. The testimony taken in this court seems to sustain the contention of the importer that: they are toys and have been so known for years. 1 see no reason why the importer is estopped by his alternative protest, or how the situation is changed because these toys were imported in different cases and under different invoices, there being no dispute that the parts referred to are intended for conjoint use and can be used in no other way.
I think the decision of the board should be reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.