U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1898

United States v. Iselin

United States v. Iselin
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Decided March 11, 1898 · Townsend
87 F. 194; 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1786

Counsel

Max J. Kohler, Asst. U. S. Atty., W. Wickham Smith, for defendants Iselin & Co., Stephen G-. Clarke, for defendants Hirsch & Co.

United States v. Iselin

Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge

(orally). These cases raise the question whether the tariff act of July 24, 1897, commonly known as the “Dingley Act,” became effective at the precise time in the day on which it was signed by the president or at the beginning of sai,d day. The various questions involved have been exhaustively pre*201seated in tlie arguments and briefs of counsel, and have been carefully considered and examined. The opinion of tlie board of general appraisers reversing the action of the collector contains a full' statement of the facts and an admirable discussion of the questions of law, and the decision of said board is hereby affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.