T. Bing & Co.'s Successors v. United States
Opinion of the Court
This importation is of decorated and ornamented plaster of paris statuettes, under Act July 24, 1897, c. 11 (30 Stat. 151 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1626]). It was assessed at 55 per cent., under paragraph 95 (30 Stat. 156 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, P- 1633]):
“China, porcelain, parían, bisque, earthen, stone, and crockery ware, including clock cases with or without movements, placques, ornaments, toys, toy tea-sets, charms, vases and statuettes painted, tinted, stained, enameled, printed, gilded, or otherwise decorated or ornamented in any manner, sixty per centum ad valorem; if plain white and without superadded ornamentation of any kind, fifty-five per centum ad valorem.”
The appellants claim it belongs under paragraph 450 (30 Stat. 193 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1678]):
“Manufactures of leather, finished or unfinished, manufactures of fur, gelatin, guttapercha, human hair, ivory, vegetable ivory, mother-of-pearl and shell, plaster of paris,. papier mache, and vulcanized india-rubher known as ‘hard rubber,’ or of which these substances or either of them is the component material of chief value, not specially provided for in this act, and shells engraved, cut, ornamented, or otherwise manufactured, thirty-five per centum ad valorem.” •
These statuettes are not within paragraph 95 (30 Stat. 156 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1633]), unless they are earthenware, or the word “including” may be said to take in statuettes of any, or any similar, material, which is not claimed. Earthenwaie, by the Century Die
Decision reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.