Munford Rubber Tire Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
Munford Rubber Tire Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
130 F. 496; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4824
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff is a citizen of Georgia; the defendants are citizens of other states, none of them being a citizen of Georgia. We hate then a controversy wholly between citizens of different states. I am unable to distinguish this case from Ins. Co. v. Champlin (C. C.) 21 Fed. 85. Subsequently followed in this circuit in Garner v. Bank (C. C.) 66 Fed. 369, and Trust Co. v. Mackay, 70 Fed. 801.
The motion to remand is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.