U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1906

Baldwin v. United States

Baldwin v. United States
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Decided January 26, 1906 · Hazel
144 F. 702; 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4723

Counsel

Walden & Webster (Henry J. Webster, of counsel), for importers., D. Frank Lloyd, Asst. U. S. Atty.

Baldwin v. United States

Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

The collector charged a duty upon the importation of 50 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 118 of the existing tariff act (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule B, 30 Stat. 159 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1636]). The appraisers returned the articles as dressed granite. The importers claim that the articles consist of monuments and pieces of monuments made from granite, and are therefore dutiable as articles (undecorated) composed wholly or in chief value of mineral substances, at 35 per centum ad valorem. I have read all the testimony and concur in the opinion of the Board of General Appraisers.

The decision is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.