U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1908

Newcomb v. Burbank

Newcomb v. Burbank
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Decided March 24, 1908 · Ward
159 F. 569; 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5025
Newcomb v. Burbank

Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion to vacate an order of the trial judge dismissing the complaint and setting aside the judgment-entered thereon.

Although the judgment is a final one, to which a writ of error lies, the plaintiffs can get no relief thereby, because the Circuit Court of Appeals, unlike the Appellate Division of the .Supreme Court of'New York, has no power to review matters of discretion. The application involves, not merely the opening of a default, but the setting aside of an order deliberately' made by another judge of this court, with a knowledge of all the facts, and resulting in a final judgment. It is certainly not in the course of orderly procedure for me to do this, even if I have the power.

The plaintiffs’ remedy will be to apply to the judge who made the order, or to revive the action brought by their testatrix in the Supreme Court of the state of New York, or to bring a new action.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.