U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1908

United States v. Graser-Rothe

United States v. Graser-Rothe
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · Decided August 21, 1908 · Thompson
164 F. 205; 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5299

Counsel

Sherman T. McPherson, U. S. Atty.

United States v. Graser-Rothe

Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, District Judge.

I agree with General Appraiser Plowell that:

“The merchandise as imported has been converted from a comparatively valueless article into a commodity of use and value by a process of manufacture specially designed for the purpose. Labor and machinery have been used in producing it, and because of the manufacturing process it has acquired a new name and a new use. It is therefore no longer a erode mineral, but is a manufactured article.”

It is dutiable at 20 per cent, ad valorem under the provision in section 6, for “all articles manufactured, in whole or in part, not provided for in this act.” See Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, 30 Stat. 205 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1693).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.