United States Court of International Trade, 1996

Saarstahl AG v. United States

Saarstahl AG v. United States
United States Court of International Trade · Decided August 13, 1996 · Carman
933 F. Supp. 1106 (Federal Supplement)
Saarstahl AG v. United States

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARMAN, Judge.

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit having remanded this matter to this Court, see Saarstahl AG v. United States, 78 F.3d 1539 (Fed.Cir. 1996), rev’g and remanding Saarstahl, AG v. United States, 858 F.Supp. 187 (CIT 1994), and in light of this Court’s opinions in British Steel PLC v. United States, 924 F.Supp. 139 (CIT 1996), appeals docketed, Nos. 96-1401 to -06 (Fed.Cir. June 21, 1996), and British Steel PLC v. United States, 936 F.Supp. 1053 (CIT 1996), it is hereby

ORDERED that this case is remanded to the Department of Commerce; and it is further

*1107ORDERED that Commerce shall follow this Court’s opinion in British Steel PLC v. United, States, 936 F.Supp. 1053 (CIT 1996) in performing its remand determination. Given that the relevant facts appear to be the same as those discussed in that opinion, Commerce may submit a remand determination virtually identical to the remand determination discussed in that opinion; and it is further

ORDERED that Commerce shall file its remand determination with this Court no later than August 19, 1996; and it is further

ORDERED that Commerce, Saarstahl AG, Inland Steel Bar Company, and amicus curiae may each file one submission commenting on the remand determination. Comments shall not exceed five pages. All comments must be filed no later than August 23,1996.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.