United States Court of International Trade, 1998

Creswell Trading Co., Inc. South Bay Foundry 1989 v. United States

Creswell Trading Co., Inc. South Bay Foundry 1989 v. United States
United States Court of International Trade · Decided September 29, 1998 · Dicarlo
24 F. Supp. 2d 318; 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 957; 22 C.I.T. 957; 20 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2054; 1998 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 143 (Federal Supplement, Second Series)
Creswell Trading Co., Inc. South Bay Foundry 1989 v. United States

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

DICARLO, Senior District Judge.

The United States Department of Commerce has submitted its Results of Redetermination in accordance with this Court’s Remand order of June 24, 1998 in the case of Creswell Trading Co., et al. v. United States, 4 F.Supp.2d 1264, Consol. Court No. 91—01—00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Redetermina *319 tion of the 1985 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific and country-wide subsidy rates to reflect ocean shipping costs. The new rates applicable to the 1985 period of review are as follows:

Carnation Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. 13.83%

Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. 30.09%

Govind Steel 51.39%

Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works 14.09%

R.B. Agarwalla & Co. 7.96%

R.S.I. 8.22%

Serampore Industries Pvt. Ltd. 22.09%

UMA Iron & Steel Co. 15.64%

Kajaria Castings Ltd. 44.84%

Super Castings (India) 29.40%

Country-wide Rate 22.09%

The Court having reviewed the Redetermi-nation Results, and Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand, and no comr ments having been received by any party within the time limit set by the Remand Order, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Redetermination Re-suits are affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that, as all other issues have been decided, this action is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.