United States Court of International Trade, 1998

Creswell Trading Co. v. United States

Creswell Trading Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade · Decided June 24, 1998 · Dicarlo
4 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (Federal Supplement, Second Series)
Creswell Trading Co. v. United States

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DiCARLO, Senior Judge.

In accordance with the decision (April 16, 1998) and mandate (June 8, 1998) of the *1265United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal Nos. 97-1486 and 97-1487, affirming-in-part and reversing-in-part this court’s decision in Creswell Trading Co. v. United States, 21 CIT ——, 964 F.Supp. 409 (1997) [hereinafter Creswell V], it is hereby

ORDERED that the portion of this court’s opinion and order in Creswell V holding that oceanic shipping costs did not constitute countervailable subsidies is vacated, and it is further

ORDERED that Commerce shall recalculate the countervailing subsidy conferred and issue new final results consistent with the opinion of the appellate court. . Remand results are due within thirty days of the date this order is entered. It is further

ORDERED that any party contesting the results shall file comments or responses within thirty days of the remand results, after which Commerce will have fifteen days in which to file a reply.

SO ORDERED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.