United States Court of International Trade, 1999

Crescent Foundry Co. v. United States

Crescent Foundry Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade · Decided January 8, 1999
1999 CIT 5
Crescent Foundry Co. v. United States

Opinion

Slip Op. 99-5 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

CRESCENT FOUNDRY CO. PVT. LTD., NANDIKESHWARI PVT. LTD., CARNATION ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., KEJRIWAL IRON & STEEL WORKS, OVERSEAS IRON FOUNDRY PVT.

LTD., RAGHUNATH PRASAD PHOOLCHAND LTD., R.B. AGARWALLA & COMPANY, RSI (INDIA) PVT. LTD., SERAMPORE INDUSTRIES PVT.

LTD., SITARAM MADHOGARHIA & SONS PVT.

LTD., SUPER CASTINGS (INDIA), TIRUPATI INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD., UMA IRON & STEEL CO. and KAJARIA IRON CASTINGS PVT. LTD., BEFORE: DiCarlo, Senior Judge Plaintiffs, Ct. No. 95-09-01239 v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY, INC., ALLEGHENY FOUNDRY CO., DEETER FOUNDRY, INC., EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS, INC., LEBARON FOUNDRY INC., MUNICIPAL CASTINGS, INC., NEENAH FOUNDRY CO., U.S. FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CO., and VULCAN FOUNDRY, INC., Defendant-Intervenors.

ORDER In conformity with the order and opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, it is hereby 95-09-01239 Page 2 ORDERED that this action is remanded to the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration for further proceedings in conformity with the order and opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and it is further ORDERED that Commerce shall file its remand results with the court within 45 days of the date of this order; and it is further ORDERED that any party contesting the remand results shall file comments with the court within 30 days of the remand results.

SO ORDERED.

Dominick L. DiCarlo Senior Judge

Dated: New York, New York January 8, 1999

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.