Uma Iron & Steel Co. v. United States
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Uma Iron & Steel Co. v. United States (United States Court of International Trade 1999)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The United States Department of Commerce submitted its Results of Redetermi-nation in accordance with this Court’s Remand order of May 13, 1994, in the case of Uma Iron and Steel Co., et al. v. United States, Consolidated Court No. 91—11— 00825. The Department of Commerce requested this remand pursuant to the remand from the Court in Creswell Trading Company, Inc., et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 91-01-00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Redetermination of the 1988 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific subsidy rates by revising the rates relating to India’s International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS). The rates, however, did not change. Accordingly, the rates applicable to the 1988 period of review are as follows:
Uma Iron & Steel Co. 10.03%
Govind Steel 14.08%
All Others 4.10%
These rates have been stipulated to and accepted by all parties to this action.
The Court having reviewed the Redeter-mination Results, Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand, and the parties having stipulated to the rates, it is hereby.
ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are affirmed; and it is further.
ORDERED that the rates listed above shall be the rates for the 1988 period, and it is further.
ORDERED that, as the parties have stipulated that they will not litigate any other issues, this action is dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.