United States Court of International Trade, 2019

Shenzhen Xinboda Indus. Co. v. United States

Shenzhen Xinboda Indus. Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade · Decided April 10, 2019 · Barnett
2019 CIT 44
Shenzhen Xinboda Indus. Co. v. United States

Opinion

Slip Op. 19-44 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

SHENZHEN XINBODA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Plaintiff, JINXIANG HEJIA CO., LTD., ET AL., Plaintiff-Intervenors, and QINGDAO TIANTAIXING FOODS CO., LTD., ET AL., Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge Consolidated-Plaintiffs, Consol. Court No. 16-00116 v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and FRESH GARLIC PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, ET AL., Defendant-Intervenors.

JUDGMENT This case having been submitted for decision, and the court, after due deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; now, in conformity with that opinion it is hereby ORDERED that the final results and final rescission of the 20th administrative review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from the People’s Republic of Consol. Court No. 16-00116 Page 2

China, see Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of China, 81 Fed. Reg. 39,897 (Dep’t Commerce June 20, 2016) (final results and final rescission of the 20th antidumping duty admin. review; 2013-2014), as amended by the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 69-1, and the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 90, are SUSTAINED, and it is further ORDERED that the subject entries must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2012).

/s/ Mark A. Barnett Mark A. Barnett, Judge Dated: April 10, 2019 New York, New York

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.