China Mfrs. All., LLC v. United States

SlipȱOp.ȱ23Ȭ105ȱ UNITEDȱSTATESȱCOURTȱOFȱINTERNATIONALȱTRADEȱ CHINAȱMANUFACTURERSȱ ALLIANCE,ȱLLCȱandȱDOUBLEȱCOINȱ HOLDINGSȱLTD.,ȱetȱal.,ȱ Plaintiffs,ȱ Before:ȱTimothyȱC.ȱStanceu,ȱJudgeȱ v.ȱ Consol.ȱCourtȱNo.ȱ15Ȭ00124ȱ UNITEDȱSTATES,ȱ Defendant.ȱ JUDGMENTȱ BeforeȱtheȱcourtȱareȱtheȱFinalȱResultsȱofȱRedeterminationȱPursuantȱtoȱCourtȱ Remandȱ(Juneȱ14,ȱ2023),ȱECFȱNo.ȱ272ȱ(theȱ“RemandȱRedetermination”)ȱsubmittedȱtoȱtheȱ courtȱbyȱtheȱInternationalȱTradeȱAdministration,ȱU.S.ȱDepartmentȱofȱCommerceȱ(“theȱ Department”)ȱinȱresponseȱtoȱtheȱcourt’sȱOpinionȱandȱOrderȱinȱChinaȱManufacturersȱ Alliance,ȱLLCȱv.ȱUnitedȱStates,ȱNo.ȱ23Ȭ75,ȱ2023ȱWLȱ3479423ȱ(Ct.ȱInt’lȱTradeȱMayȱ16,ȱ2023)ȱ (“CMAȱV”).ȱ TheȱcourtȱdeterminesȱthatȱtheȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱcompliesȱwithȱtheȱ court’sȱdecisionsȱinȱCMAȱVȱthatȱplaintiffsȱChinaȱManufacturersȱAlliance,ȱLLCȱandȱ DoubleȱCoinȱHoldingsȱLtd.ȱ(collectively,ȱ“DoubleȱCoin”)ȱdidȱnotȱrebutȱtheȱ Department’sȱpresumptionȱofȱcontrolȱbyȱtheȱGovernmentȱofȱChinaȱoverȱexportȱactivitiesȱ andȱthatȱDoubleȱCoin,ȱconsequently,ȱmustȱbeȱassignedȱtheȱPRCȬwideȱrateȱofȱ105.31%.ȱ Consol.ȱCourtȱNo.ȱ15Ȭ00124ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱPageȱ2ȱ ȱ NoȱpartyȱfiledȱcommentsȱinȱoppositionȱtoȱtheȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱwithinȱ theȱ30ȬdayȱperiodȱprovidedȱforȱinȱUSCITȱRuleȱ56.2(h).ȱ UponȱconsiderationȱofȱtheȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱandȱallȱotherȱpapersȱandȱ proceedingsȱhadȱherein,ȱandȱuponȱdueȱdeliberation,ȱitȱisȱherebyȱ ORDEREDȱthatȱtheȱDepartment’sȱfindingȱinȱtheȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱthatȱ DoubleȱCoinȱdidȱnotȱrebutȱtheȱpresumptionȱofȱgovernmentȱcontrolȱbe,ȱandȱherebyȱis,ȱ sustained;ȱitȱisȱfurtherȱ ȱ ORDEREDȱthatȱtheȱDepartment’sȱassignmentȱofȱtheȱPRCȬwideȱrateȱofȱ105.31%ȱtoȱ DoubleȱCoinȱbe,ȱandȱherebyȱis,ȱsustained;ȱandȱitȱisȱfurtherȱ ȱ ORDEREDȱthatȱentriesȱaffectedȱbyȱthisȱlitigationȱshallȱbeȱliquidatedȱinȱ accordanceȱwithȱtheȱfinalȱjudicialȱdecisionȱinȱthisȱaction.ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ /s/ȱTimothyȱC.ȱStanceuȱȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ TimothyȱC.ȱStanceu,ȱJudgeȱ Dated:ȱJulyȱ19,ȱ2023ȱ ȱ ȱNewȱYork,ȱNewȱYorkȱ ȱ