Yama Ribbons and Bows Co. v. United States

SlipȱOp.ȱ24Ȭ89ȱ UNITEDȱSTATESȱCOURTȱOFȱINTERNATIONALȱTRADEȱ YAMAȱRIBBONSȱANDȱBOWSȱCO.,ȱLTD.,ȱ Plaintiff,ȱ v.ȱ UNITEDȱSTATES,ȱ Before:ȱȱTimothyȱC.ȱStanceu,ȱJudgeȱ Defendant,ȱ CourtȱNo.ȱ20Ȭ00059ȱ andȱ BERWICKȱOFFRAYȱLLC,ȱ DefendantȬIntervenor.ȱ

JUDGMENTȱ BeforeȱtheȱcourtȱareȱtheȱFinalȱResultsȱofȱRedeterminationȱPursuantȱtoȱCourtȱRemandȱ (Juneȱ10,ȱ2024),ȱECFȱNo.ȱ57Ȭ1ȱ(theȱ“SecondȱRemandȱRedetermination”),ȱwhichȱtheȱ InternationalȱTradeȱAdministration,ȱU.S.ȱDepartmentȱofȱCommerceȱ(“Commerce”)ȱ issuedȱinȱresponseȱtoȱtheȱcourt’sȱopinionȱandȱorderȱinȱYamaȱRibbonsȱandȱBowsȱCo.,ȱLtd.ȱv.ȱ UnitedȱStates,ȱ48ȱCITȱ__,ȱ698ȱF.ȱSupp.ȱ3dȱ1255ȱ(2024).ȱȱInȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱ Redetermination,ȱCommerceȱselectedȱaȱnewȱcountervailingȱdutyȱsubsidyȱrateȱforȱtheȱ ExportȱBuyer’sȱCreditȱProgramȱofȱ0.87%ȱand,ȱaccordingly,ȱrecalculatedȱaȱtotalȱsubsidyȱ CourtȱNo.ȱ20Ȭ00059ȱ ȱ Pageȱ2ȱ ȱ rateȱofȱ22.20%ȱforȱplaintiffȱYamaȱRibbonsȱandȱBows,ȱCo.,ȱLtd.ȱ(“Yama”).ȱȱSecondȱRemandȱ Redeterminationȱatȱ6.ȱ Noȱpartyȱsubmittedȱsubstantiveȱcommentsȱon,ȱorȱotherwiseȱobjectedȱto,ȱtheȱ SecondȱRemandȱRedetermination.ȱȱPl.’sȱCommentsȱonȱCommerce’sȱFinalȱ RedeterminationȱpursuantȱtoȱCourtȱRemandȱ(Julyȱ12,ȱ2024),ȱECFȱNo.ȱ59;ȱDef.ȬInt.’sȱ SubmissionȱIndicatingȱNoȱCommentsȱ(Julyȱ15,ȱ2024),ȱECFȱNo.ȱ60.ȱȱDefendantȱadvocatesȱ thatȱtheȱcourtȱsustainȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱRedetermination.ȱȱDef.’sȱCommentsȱinȱ SupportȱofȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱ(Julyȱ24,ȱ2024),ȱECFȱNo.ȱ61.ȱ TheȱcourtȱhasȱreviewedȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱandȱhasȱ determinedȱthatȱitȱcompliesȱwithȱtheȱopinionȱandȱorderȱinȱYamaȱRibbonsȱandȱBowsȱCo.,ȱ Ltd.ȱv.ȱUnitedȱStates,ȱ48ȱCITȱ__,ȱ698ȱF.ȱSupp.ȱ3dȱ1255ȱ(2024).ȱȱTherefore,ȱuponȱ considerationȱofȱtheȱSecondȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱandȱallȱpapersȱandȱproceedingsȱ hadȱherein,ȱuponȱdueȱdeliberation,ȱandȱinȱtheȱabsenceȱofȱanȱobjectionȱbyȱanyȱparty,ȱitȱisȱ herebyȱ ORDEREDȱthatȱSecondȱRemandȱRedeterminationȱbe,ȱandȱherebyȱis,ȱsustained;ȱ andȱitȱisȱfurtherȱȱ ȱ