Catfish Farmers of Am. v. United States
Opinion
Slip Op. 26-103
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CATFISH FARMERS OF AMERICA, et al.,
Plaintiffs, v.
UNITED STATES, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge
Defendant, Court No. 24-00082 and
CAN THO IMPORT EXPORT SEAFOOD JOINT STOCK COMPANY,
Defendant-Intervenor.
JUDGMENT
Before the court are the Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Court Remand (Apr. 15, 2026), ECF Nos. 54 (public), 55 (conf.) (the “Remand Redetermination”). No party has commented in opposition to the Remand Redetermination as it pertains to this case, and defendant United States advocates, accordingly, that it be sustained by the court in that respect. Def.’s Req. to Sustain Remand Results (June 2, 2026), ECF No. 58.
The court concludes that the Remand Redetermination, as it pertains to this case, complies with the court’s order in Catfish Farmers of Am. v. United States, 49 CIT __, 815 Court No. 24-00082 Page 2 Fed. Supp. 3d 1339 (2025), in particular in stating that “[w]e agree that the allegation identified an error that was ministerial in nature.” Remand Redetermination 20-21.
Therefore, in consideration of the Remand Redetermination and all papers and proceedings had herein, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Remand Redetermination be, and hereby is, sustained as it pertains to this action; and it is further
ORDERED that entries affected by this action shall be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this litigation.
_/s/ Timothy C. Stanceu_ Timothy C. Stanceu Judge
Dated: September 4, 2026
New York, New York
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.