United States v. Welborne
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Sheehan (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1983)
- United States v. Caballero (United States Court of Military Appeals 1975)
- United States v. Tee (United States Court of Military Appeals 1971)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner was convicted by general court-martial of wrongful possession of a narcotic drug,
We need only note the assignment of error with respect to the charge of violation of the general order by possession of a hypodermic syringe. The accused contends that the prosecution must allege and prove that his possession was without proper authority and for other than the lawful purposes or “exceptions” enumerated in'the general order. Identical contentions were resolved against the accused in United States v. Gohagen (No. 858), 7 CMR 51, decided February 6, 1953. As we decided in that case, the exceptions in the general order are not parts of the conduct proscribed therein at. all. It is incumbent on the accused to bring himself within the exceptions if he is able to do so.
Further discussion is unnecessary in light of our opinion in the Gohagen ease. Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.
In violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 728.
In violation of Article 92, Uniform Code, supra, 50 USC § 686. The order violated was Circular Number 38, General Headquarters, Far East Command, APO 500, dated August 27, 1951, paragraph 2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.