United States Court of Military Appeals, 1973

United States v. Brown

United States v. Brown
United States Court of Military Appeals · Decided June 8, 1973 · Alderman, Darden, Forth, Supra
22 C.M.A. 331
United States v. Brown

Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Evidence of previous conviction by summary courts-martial resulting in a sentence to confinement was considered against the appellants on sentencing during trial or by the convening authority before his action in each of these cases. United States v Alderman, 22 USCMA 298, 46 CMR 298 (May 25, 1973) prohibits the use of such evidence. A fair risk exists that the evidence of such previous conviction was disadvantageous to each of the accused. Accordingly, we return the records of trial to the Judge Advocates General-of the respective services for submission to a Court of Military Review for further proceedings consistent with our disposition in United States v Aiderman, supra.

Chief Judge Darden dissents for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in United States v Alderman, supra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.