Bilotta v. Commander, 3d Infantry Division, United States Army
Opinion of the Court
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief and of the Reply to Order to Show Cause filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that the convening authority has acted upon the record of petitioner’s trial by general court-martial, as required by Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 860, and said record has been referred to the United States Army Court of Military Review for further review pursuant to Article 66(b), Uniform Code, supra, 10 USC 866(b), it is, by the Court, this 24th day of September 1973,
ORDERED:
That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed as moot. Rhoades v. Haynes, 22 USCMA 189, 46 CMR 189 (1973).
This action is without prejudice to the right of petitioner to raise the same issue by appropriate assignment of error before the Court of Military Review.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.