United States v. Febus-Santini
United States v. Febus-Santini
23 C.M.A. 226
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
By amendment to the original convening order, the military judge who presided had been relieved. The court that tried this accused was, therefore, improperly constituted. United States v Johnson, 23 USCMA 104, 48 CMR 665 (1974); cf. United States v Harnish, 12 USCMA 443, 31 CMR 29 (1961). The decision of the U.S. Court of Military Review is reversed. The findings and sentence are set aside. A rehearing may be ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.