United States v. Brundidge
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Cordova (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1977)
- United States v. Sharper (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1984)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
In each of these cases, a pretrial agreement between the accused and the convening authority included a condition limiting the accused’s presentation at trial of motions on matters “other than jurisdiction” before entry of a plea of guilty. We condemned such a limitation in United States v. Holland, 23 U.S.C.M.A. 442, 50 C.M.R. 461, 1 M.J. 58 (1975). Accordingly, as in Holland, we reverse the decision of the Court of Military Review and set aside the findings of guilty and the sentence in each case. The record of trial of each accused is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army for submission to the original or other competent convening authority. A rehearing in each instance may be ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.