United States v. Rada

OPINION OF THE COURT

Here, as in United States v. Cree, 1 M.J. 210 (1975), the accused contends that the staff judge advocate’s post-trial review is erroneous and prejudicial because it includes a summary of the evidence of an offense of which the accused was acquitted. For the reasons set out in our opinion in Cree, we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.

(dissenting):

For the reasons set forth in my dissent in United States v. Cree, 1 M.J. 210 (1975), I dissent.