United States v. Blair
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- United States v. Haynes (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1981)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
We granted review of this case to determine whether prosecution exhibit 3-DA Form 2627-was properly admitted into evidence by the military judge. We notice that the commander did not complete block 8 of the form which states: “You are advised of your right to appeal this punishment within_days to_, the next superior authority.” However, just beneath this block the accused signed and dated a block indicating that he did not wish to appeal. Under these circumstances the failure to complete block 8 is not sufficient to require exclusion of the exhibit. Cf. United States v. Mack, 9 M.J. 300 (C.M.A. 1980); United States v. Negrone, 9 M.J. 171 (C.M.A. 1980).
Accordingly, the decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.