Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1896

Severs v. Bull

Severs v. Bull
Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · Decided February 15, 1896 · Lewis
1 Indian Terr. 8; 35 S.W. 234; 1896 Indian Terr. LEXIS 54

Counsel

W. T. Hutchings and A. Z. English, for appellants., Thomas A. Sanson, Jr., and P. L. Soper, for appellee.

Severs v. Bull

Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.

The fact of appellee’s nonresidence is not shown by the record. No error, therefore, is apparent in the action of the trial court in overruling the motion to dismiss. A motion for a new trial was not filed, nor was the action of the trial court upon the motion to dismiss preserved by bill of exceptions, both of which things were necessary to be done to enable this court to review the error complained of. See case of Severs vs. Trust Co. (this day decided) 1 Ind. Ter. 2. The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.