Protest 165846-G of G. M. Boutross Co.

Opinion by

It was found that certain items consist of filet laces similar to those involved in United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) and other items like those passed upon in Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396). On the established facts filet laces and certain towels and squares were held dutiable as embroidered at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.