Protests 306894-G of Butler Bros.
Protests 306894-G of Butler Bros.
1 Cust. Ct. 521
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the atomizers and thimbles in question are chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) cited.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.